Reductions MCQ Quiz - Objective Question with Answer for Reductions - Download Free PDF

Last updated on Mar 17, 2025

Latest Reductions MCQ Objective Questions

Top Reductions MCQ Objective Questions

Reductions Question 1:

Let A be recursively enumerable language which is not recursive and A’ be its complement, also B be recursive language and B’ be its complement. Let X and Y be two languages such that A’ reduces to X and Y reduces to B’ and the reduction is many to one. Which of the following is/are true?

I.  X can be recursively enumerable language

II. X is not recursively enumerable language

III. Y is recursive language

IV. Y may or may not be recursive language

  1. I and III
  2. I and IV
  3. II and III
  4. II and IV

Answer (Detailed Solution Below)

Option 3 : II and III

Reductions Question 1 Detailed Solution

  • If B is recursive language (REC) then B’ is also REC and recursive language is decidable. Y reduces to B Since B is decidable then Y is also decidable and decidable languages are recursive.
  • A is recursively enumerable language (REL) but not REC and hence A’ is also not REL. Since A’ reduces to X then X is also not REL.

Reductions Question 2:

Which of the following are correct?

Answer (Detailed Solution Below)

Option :

Reductions Question 2 Detailed Solution

The correct answer is option 1 and option 4.

Key Points

A language L1 is polynomial-time reducible to L2 (L1 ≤P L2) if there is a polynomial-time computable function f from languages to languages such that for all x, x ∈ L1 iff f(x) ∈ L2. If L1 is polynomial-time reducible to L2, then an algorithm to solve L2 can be used to obtain an algorithm to solve L1.

Option 1: If  L1 ≤m Land  L2 ≤m L then  L1 ≤m L3 

True, L1 is polynomial-time reducible to L2 and L2 is polynomial-time reducible to L3. Then L1 is polynomial-time reducible to  L3 is acceptable. 

Option 2: If  L1 ≤m L2  then  L2 ≤m L

False, L1 is polynomial-time reducible to L2 then we can't say L2 is polynomial-time reducible to L1. 

 False, L1 is polynomial-time reducible to L2 then we can't say complement of L2 is polynomial-time reducible to complement of L1. 

True, L1 is polynomial-time reducible to complement of L1 then L1 is decidable. A language is decidable when L and L complement both decidable.

Reductions Question 3:

Consider two decision problems 𝑄1, 𝑄2 such that 𝑄1 reduces in polynomial time to 3 - SAT and 3 - SAT reduces in polynomial time to 𝑄2. Then which one of the following is consistent with the above statement?

  1. ๐‘„1 is in NP, ๐‘„2 is NP hard.
  2. ๐‘„2 is in NP, ๐‘„1 is NP hard.
  3. Both ๐‘„1 and ๐‘„2 are in NP.
  4. Both ๐‘„1 and ๐‘„2 are NP hard.

Answer (Detailed Solution Below)

Option 1 : ๐‘„1 is in NP, ๐‘„2 is NP hard.

Reductions Question 3 Detailed Solution

I) If a is reducible to B then we can say that B is at least as difficult as A. (that is by reducing a problem can be complicated or transformed).

II) All NP complete problems are also NP hard

III) 3 SAT is NP – complete.

Given, 

Hot Links๏ผš teen patti vungo teen patti master download teen patti joy official teen patti app